Search results for "fair trial."

showing 10 items of 14 documents

Inquisitio Contra Haereticos. The Inquisition Trials of Witches, Heretics and Secret Societies

2022

By means of very rare manuscripts and precious historical sources (dating back even to the 16th century), this book aims to reconstruct the varied and complex phenomenon of the Inquisition, with particular scientific reference to the events that took place and unfolded in Sicily through the centuries. Based on primary ancient documents, it constitutes a monographic and reasoned catalogue of the international exhibition on the evolution of the Inquisition, curated in Palermo (Italy) by Francesco Callari and Antonio Scaglione. The exhibition, which was supported by an authoritative Scientific Board, was awarded important institutional recognitions and, in particular, the Medal of the Presiden…

Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Human Rights Criminal Justice Historical Comparison Inquisition Torture Fair Trial Criminal evidence Defence RightsSettore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoSettore IUS/19 - Storia Del Diritto Medievale E ModernoSettore IUS/16 - Diritto Processuale PenaleSettore IUS/17 - Diritto Penale
researchProduct

EUIPO Boards of Appeal in the Light of the Principle of Fair Trial

2022

The EUIPO’s Boards of Appeal are called upon to decide on appeals against decisions by the bodies of ‘first instance’. However, their judicial function has always been denied. Conversely, the essay tends to place the Boards of Appeal of the EUIPO in any case within the concept of ‘court’, as defined by the ECtHR, within the framework of Article 6 ECtHR, because it assesses their independence, impartiality, and in general the guarantees required by the ‘fair trial’, until concluding that it is a paradigmatic model in the overall administration and judicial system. EUIPO Boards of Appeal, European Court of Human Rights, Court of Justice of the Eurpean Union, EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, …

EUIPO Boards of Appeal European Court of Human Rights Court of Justice of the Eurpean Union EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Fair trialLawSettore IUS/21 - Diritto Pubblico ComparatoEuropean Public Law
researchProduct

Report on Italy

2019

The right to take part personally in criminal proceedings, although not expressly provided at a Constitutional level, is an expression of the principle of a fair trial upheld by Article 6 of the ECHR and translated into Article 111 of the Italian Constitution. In the course of years, the CCP, also following some condemnations by the Strasbourg Court, underwent several modifications aimed at implementing principles and conditions affirmed by the ECHR that can legitimate proceedings in absentia of a defendant. This study is structured into different parts. In the first, an analysis of national rules concerning the participation of a defendant and other private parties at each stage of proceed…

Expression (architecture)Fair trialConstitutionLawPolitical sciencemedia_common.quotation_subjectSettore IUS/16 - Diritto Processuale Penalemedia_commonParticipatory rights private parties videoconferences in absentia trials remedies letters rogatory EAW EIO.
researchProduct

Fair Trial e "giusto processo" italiano

2016

Il contributo esplora le sequenze storiche e le dinamiche culturali dell’innesto, nella cultura giuridica italiana, della categoria concettuale del “giusto processo”, dal primo affacciarsi del concetto nel dibattito dottrinale della seconda metà del novecento al suo consolidarsi, anche grazie alla giurisprudenza costituzionale, dapprima alla stregua di una ricostruzione interna condotta in chiave autarchica, di seguito, e sempre più consapevolmente, alla luce del canone sovranazionale del fair trial e del case law della Corte di Strasburgo; il punto di svolta, più che nelle sentenze “gemelle” del 2007, è individuato nel varo del “nuovo” art. 117 Cost. e nel successivo stratificarsi di nuove…

Fair TrialGiusto processoSettore IUS/16 - Diritto Processuale PenaleItalian Criminal Procedure
researchProduct

Mutamento del giudice e rinnovazione della prova: la Corte costituzionale esorbita dai confini accusatori

2020

The “Judge of the laws” delivers to the Parliament punctuals directives to give concreteness to the reasonable duration of the trial. What is at stake is the right to renew the evidence in the event of a change of the judge, which is drastically reduced to prevent it from being used merely for dilatory purposes. The Author criticizes the decision in question, fearing a dangerous drift: the renewal only of the “useful” evidence.

Right to a fair trial - The reasonable duration of the trial - The right to renew the evidence - Change of the judge - Drift - The useful evidenceSettore IUS/16 - Diritto Processuale Penale
researchProduct

La ragionevole durata del processo civile: uno studio di diritto comparato

2021

Il volume indaga il tema della ragionevole durata del processo civile, ponendo a raffronto le principali riforme adottate in Italia e in Inghilterra per ridurre i ritardi della giustizia nazionale in linea con l’art. 6 Cedu. La trattazione prende in esame l’assetto normativo e rimediale di ciascuno dei sistemi giuridici considerati guardando, in prospettiva diacronica, alle fonti legislative e giurisprudenziali, nonché agli indicatori internazionali e alle nuove tecnologie digitali, che mirano all’efficienza processuale. Il quadro così tracciato mette in luce la differente declinazione della ragionevolezza dei tempi del processo nei due ordinamenti europei, in risposta alla necessità di gar…

Right to a fair trial within a reasonable timeCivil litigation efficiencyComparative lawArticle 6 of ECHR
researchProduct

Notificazioni al difensore dirette all'imputato

2022

The delegation law, intervening on the discipline of notifications, intends to consolidate the system of notifications by delivery to the defender. The analysis of the various guiding criteria will bring out a picture that seems to favor legal knowledge of the act, in clear contrast to the most recent arrests of jurisprudence.

Settore IUS/16 - Diritto Processuale PenaleNotifications Defender Fair trial Reform Right of defense Efficiency
researchProduct

The defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in the Italian criminal justice system

2021

The criminal law standard of Beyond A Reasonable Doubt (BARD) constitutes an evidentiary and judicial rule, formulated and applied for centuries in common law jurisdictions, which was expressly stated in the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure only about fifteen years ago. Unfortunately, the concept of reasonable doubt is inherently complex and does not easily lend itself to definition or refinement. In this regard, the Author examines especially the various positions and elaborations developed by legal literature and case-law in Italy, proposing a specific interpretation of the BARD rule that enhances and completes the particular procedural connotations of the adversarial system adopted i…

Sociology and Political ScienceCommon lawO standard penal do Beyond A Reasonable Doubt (BARD) constitui uma regra de prova e de juízo formulada e aplicada durante séculos em jurisdições de common law que foi expressamente introduzida no Código de Processo Penal italiano apenas cerca de quinze anos atrás. Infelizmente o conceito dedúvida razoável é inerentemente complexo e não se presta facilmente a uma definição ou a uma melhor delimitação. Diante disso o autor examina sobretudo as diferentes posições e elaborações desenvolvidas pela doutrina e pela jurisprudência na Itália oferecendo uma interpretação específica da regra BARD que valoriza e completa as conotações processuais particulares do sistema acusatório adotado na justiça penal italiana.Criminal procedureAdversarial systemreasonable doubtPolitical sciencefair trial.criminal procedureReasonable doubtPresumption of innocenceInterpretation (philosophy)dúvida razoável; processo penal; presunção de inocência; ônus da prova; standard de pro-va; método de raciocínio judicial; justo processo.judicial reasoning methodKPsychiatry and Mental healthreasonable doubt; criminal procedure; presumption of innocence; burden of proof; stand-ard of proof; judicial reasoning method; fair trial.AnthropologyLawSettore IUS/16 - Diritto Processuale PenaleCriminal lawpresumption of innocencestand-ard of proofburden of proofLawSafety ResearchSettore IUS/17 - Diritto PenaleCriminal justice
researchProduct

Effetti “inibitori” della interdittiva antimafia e bilanciamento fra principi costituzionali: alcune questioni di legittimità dedotte in una recente …

2021

Moving from a very recent order of submission to the Italian Constitutional Court, the paper analyses some of the critical profiles that – in the last years – are related to the institute if the s.c. “interdittiva antimafia” (i.e. “anti-mafia interdictive), among the wider discipline provided against the organized crime. Regarding the parameters evoked by the Administrative Judge, it is intended to reflect on the delicate balancing procedure between rights and liberties that – equally guaranteed by the Constitution – inevitably collide as the aforementioned institute is enforced and that require, then, a particular care by the proceeding Public Administration: the private economic initiativ…

fair trial private economic initiative freedom right to work judiciary control measures
researchProduct

La regola di giudizio nel patteggiamento tra cursus ordinario e revisione

2022

The article aims to deepen a fundamental and much debated profile in relation to the special rite of the Italian patteggiamento. In particular, the Author, in the light of an analysis of the undoubted particularities of the judicial mechanism of application of penalty upon request of the parties, intends to focus on the essence and the operation that the judgment rule assumes, respectively, in the ordinary cursus of criminal proceeding and in therevision, trying to offer an interpretative reconstruction that is able to reconcile the (substantial) needs of justice and the (formal) reasons for systematic coherence.

fair trialcriminal justice systemcriminal proceedings.Settore IUS/16 - Diritto Processuale Penalerelevant and admissible evidenceSettore IUS/17 - Diritto Penalecriminal procedure
researchProduct